Cloning Windows 11 and Getting it to Boot: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
== Fast Boot == | |||
https://www.windowscentral.com/how-disable-windows-10-fast-startup | |||
Control Panel, Power, Choose what the power buttons do*, Turn on fast startup (To modify the settings, see the Change Settings that are currently unavailable towards the top) | |||
OR | |||
Registry: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Power\HiberbootEnabled (0 = off, 1 = on) | |||
<nowiki>*</nowiki> And of course the setting is under the "Choose what the power buttons do" even though it is no way involved with any power buttons. And for that matter, why is the word buttonS plural? For the life of me, I cannot think of a single computer that has multiple external power buttons (the exception being motherboards that have the power button mounted on the case, plus a button the motherboard manufacturer placed on the motherboard itself, and not counting the power SWITCH on the rear of a PSU). | |||
== Google Tirade == | |||
...and the number one item returned from a search by Google on the terms: "Windows" "Ready Boost" (or "ReadyBoost") is this retarded feature that actually promotes the idea of using Read Boost on a USB 2.0 device in the year 2022: https://www.thewindowsclub.com/how-to-turn-readyboost-on-or-off-in-windows-7 WTF?!?!? | |||
Thankfully in an odd twist of fate where Microsoft actually gets something right in preventing users from enabling something they shouldn't is this; | |||
[[File:ReadyBoost.jpg|alt=ReadyBoost DENIED! (a good thing)|left|thumb|ReadyBoost DENIED! (a good thing)]] | |||
ReadyBoost is not enabled because the computer is fast enough that ReadyBoost is unlikely to provide additional benefit. (...and it should be reworded: The ReadyBoost feature is not available. It is because this computer is fast enough that it will not benefit from this feature. | |||
Again, Microsoft got something right. Wow! | |||
So back to Google bashing... This is an example of why computers aren't smart enough to know the best answer. In the year 2022, the best formatted website (AKA conforming to Google's 'Best Practices') gets the number one listing, not the website containing the best information. It's that way with so many sites these days that poach content off of other sites, do a great job conforming to Google's 'Best Practices' in terms of SEO, and get listed first. | |||